Skip to content
What we know

Every finding, with its evidence

Each finding is labeled by what kind of evidence supports it and cites the document and page. Use the link on any finding to share it directly.

Which version of the plan is being reviewed?

The developer’s application and presentation contain different figures for several important parts of The QUAD. Some may reflect evolving plans or different assumptions, but clarification would help residents understand exactly what is being considered.

Dome size Conflicting figures 310,000 sq. ft. on the site plans; 217,500 sq. ft. in the fiscal assumptions.
Application · Sept 29 “Dome Turf Facility,” 310,000 sq. ft. (A p. 79).
Presentation · Oct 5 Master plans and site data show 310,000 sq. ft. (P pp. 26–28, 32); the fiscal program table lists 217,500 sq. ft. (P p. 47).
Traffic assumptions Differing assumption The traffic memo models one 120-room hotel and a 10,000 sq. ft. daycare; the program shows 226 rooms and 30,000 sq. ft.
Application · Sept 29 KLOA memo models “Hotel (120 Rooms)” and “Day Care Center (10,000 s.f.)” (A p. 87). The program lists two hotels, 106 + 120 rooms, and a 30,000 sq. ft. daycare (A pp. 79–80).
Presentation · Oct 5 Two hotels, 226 rooms (P p. 48); daycare 30,000 sq. ft. (P p. 47). The traffic slide gives no trip counts (P p. 45).
Athletic facilities Conflicting figures Court and field counts differ: 3 courts and 5 fields in the application; 10 courts, 2 rinks and 9 fields in the presentation’s program.
Application · Sept 29 Indoor facilities 80,000 sq. ft. with 3 basketball courts; outdoor athletics 8.5 acres with 5 fields or diamonds (A p. 79).
Presentation · Oct 5 Main indoor facilities 230,500 sq. ft. with 10 courts and 2 ice rinks; 12.2 acres with 9 fields or diamonds (P p. 47). Master plans show 5 fields (P pp. 26, 28).
Commercial uses Detail in one document Outlot counts and uses vary, and some uses appear in only one document.
Application · Sept 29 Six retail/restaurant outlots on Half Day Road, 25,000 sq. ft. (A p. 79). A gas station appears as a supporting use; a car wash is not mentioned (A p. 30).
Presentation · Oct 5 Six outlots in the program (P p. 47), but the mixed-use plan shows four outlot uses, including a gas station, retail and tunnel car wash (P p. 27). The 50,000 sq. ft. family entertainment center appears only in the fiscal table (P p. 47).
Development phasing Conflicting figures Construction schedules and phase assignments differ between the two documents.
Application · Sept 29 Sports complex Q1 2027–Q2 2028; commercial/retail hub Q4 2028–Q3 2030; community/culture Q1–Q3 2029 (A p. 26).
Presentation · Oct 5 Phase 1 Q3 2026–Q3 2027; Phase 2 Q4 2027–Q3 2028; Phase 3 Q4 2027–Q3 2028. Map labels read “Phase 2 – Q1 2027” (P p. 59).

Page cites: A = application PDF page; P = presentation slide. Resident-compiled comparison of 27 items (PDF, Oct 15) ↗ (opens in a new tab) · Source documents

53 of 53 findings
Documented Development scope

A conceptual PUD called The QUAD has been filed

The Donato Foundation applied for a conceptual planned unit development at the former Trinity International University campus. The requested mixed-use zoning covers sports, recreation, retail, commercial, community and cultural uses.

Source: S pp. 1–5; A PDF pp. 1–4
Developer proposal Development scope

About 116 acres, including two Village-owned parcels

The PUD boundary covers roughly 116 acres. It includes parcels owned by the foundation and two parcels owned by the Village that the applicant wants to incorporate.

Source: S p. 6; A PDF p. 2
Estimate Development scope

About 800,000 sq. ft. of buildings at full buildout

The developer’s preliminary development program totals approximately 800,000 square feet. Figures in different parts of the presentation are not perfectly consistent.

Source: P p. 47
Developer proposal Development scope

230,500 sq. ft. of main indoor sports space

Described as 10 basketball courts, 2 ice rinks and support space.

Source: P p. 47
Open question Development scope

The dome’s size differs between tables

The fiscal program lists the air-supported dome turf facility at 217,500 sq. ft.; the parking/site-data table lists “Dome” at 310,000 sq. ft. The applicant has not reconciled the two.

Source: P pp. 32, 47
Developer proposal Development scope

12.2 acres of outdoor athletics

The fiscal program lists 12.2 acres and nine multipurpose fields/diamonds.

Source: P p. 47
Developer proposal Development scope

Two hotels with 226 rooms

A 106-room hotel at Trinity Hall (the parking table says “106 beds”) and a 120-room upper-midscale hotel, which the site plan refers to as a Marriott-branded concept.

Source: P pp. 32, 47–48
Developer proposal Development scope

Entertainment, restaurants and roadside retail

A 50,000 sq. ft. family entertainment center (bowling, arcade, food and beverage among potential uses), 35,000 sq. ft. of hotel/banquet restaurants, six conceptual outlots totaling 25,000 sq. ft. along Half Day Road, two drive-through restaurants (4,500 and 2,500 sq. ft.) and a 3,500 sq. ft. gas station/retail/tunnel car wash.

Source: P pp. 30, 32, 47
Developer proposal Development scope

Community, medical and event space

Daycare (30,000 sq. ft.), library (32,000 sq. ft.; potential public-library dedication is marked as a question in the developer’s assumptions), rehabilitation facility (20,000), ministry building expansion (22,500), banquet hall (18,000) and mansion/event space (5,000).

Source: P p. 47
Estimate Development scope

“Open space” includes fields and stormwater areas

The application estimates 33 acres (28.4%) of public or common open space at full buildout, counting fields, trails, wetlands and stormwater detention. It does not establish how much would be freely accessible public parkland.

Source: A PDF pp. 23–26; S p. 6
Developer proposal Traffic & parking

2,518 parking spaces

The parking model shows 2,798 spaces before a 280-space accessibility/landscape-island adjustment, for 2,518 provided.

Source: P p. 32
Developer proposal Traffic & parking

Off-site parking for large events

The applicant requests flexibility to use off-site parking for occasional tournament demand.

Source: S p. 10
Developer proposal Traffic & parking

Vehicle access from Half Day Road

Access is primarily via Half Day Road / IL 22 at Lakeside Drive and Trinity University Drive.

Source: A PDF p. 86; S p. 10
Documented Traffic & parking

No road connection to Duffy Lane is proposed

The Village staff report says no new vehicle road connection to Duffy Lane is proposed, though walking paths may connect toward Duffy.

Source: S p. 10
Estimate Traffic & parking

7,586 net daily vehicle trips — not 7,586 visitors

The KLOA preliminary memo (Aug 12) estimates 11,632 gross and 7,586 net new daily one-way vehicle trips, counting each entry and each exit. It uses ITE trip-generation factors with a 10% internal-capture reduction and pass-by reductions.

Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Estimate Traffic & parking

Peak-hour estimates

Net trips, both directions: 532 in the weekday AM peak hour, 967 in the weekday PM peak hour, and 875 reported for the Saturday midday peak.

Source: A PDF p. 87
Open question Traffic & parking

The Saturday table doesn’t add up

Saturday “In” (513) plus “Out” (392) equals 905, not the 875 reported. In the basketball row, 36 + 43 = 79, but the total cell reads 49. A corrected table should come from KLOA.

Source: A PDF p. 87
Open question Traffic & parking

Traffic inputs differ from the current program

KLOA models 120 hotel rooms (vs. 226), 10,000 sq. ft. of daycare (vs. 30,000) and eight soccer fields (vs. nine fields/diamonds). Some categories differ in kind, so this does not by itself prove an underestimate, but reconciliation is needed.

Source: A PDF p. 87; P p. 47
Documented Traffic & parking

A preliminary memo, not a full operations study

The memo states IL 22 carries about 20,900 vehicles a day against an estimated 30,000 capacity. It does not settle intersection operations, queues or tournament-day conditions.

Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Open question Traffic & parking

No visitor forecast has been submitted

The submitted materials do not include a clearly comparable annual or peak-weekend visitor forecast. Vehicle trips cannot be converted directly into attendance.

Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Developer proposal Taxes & TIF

Sports exempt, commercial taxable

The applicant says Phase 1 sports facilities would be foundation-owned and intended to stay tax-exempt; Phase 2 commercial lots would be platted for sale or lease and reassessed as taxable; Phase 3 community amenities are intended to remain exempt.

Source: A PDF p. 25
Open question Taxes & TIF

Status of a nonprofit exemption request

Earlier county research identified a pending 2026 nonprofit full-exemption request for parcel 16-19-105-007, reportedly received Sept 17, 2026. Current status should be checked in the county system. Illinois exemptions depend on qualifying ownership and use.

Source: Lake County exemption record
Developer proposal Taxes & TIF

The developer proposes a TIF district

The presentation includes a “TIF District / Development Agreement” step, estimates 120–180 days for it, and says demolition of deteriorated buildings would be deferred until the TIF is established.

Source: P p. 60
Developer proposal Taxes & TIF

Near-zero base value; demolition potentially reimbursable

The developer models an approximately zero base equalized assessed valuation under nonprofit exemption, with increment from taxable development on the north half. Demolition after district establishment is identified as potentially reimbursable.

Source: P p. 62
Open question Taxes & TIF

No TIF terms exist yet

The filings establish no approved TIF boundaries, redevelopment plan, independent eligibility study, reimbursement ceiling, borrowing schedule or executed agreement.

Source: P pp. 60–62
Developer proposal Taxes & TIF

Several possible funding sources; no investors named

The application lists foundation equity, philanthropy, grants, institutional lenders, development partnerships and tenant/operator investment as possible sources. It does not name all eventual financing partners, commercial owners or operators.

Source: A PDF pp. 20, 25
Estimate Taxes & TIF

Developer projects ~$1.18M a year for the Village

At full buildout: $604,375 in sales/food-and-beverage taxes, $517,114 in hotel tax and $59,824 in Village property taxes. These are projections, not guarantees.

Source: P pp. 48–52
Estimate Taxes & TIF

$739,136 a year for other taxing bodies

Projected gross property taxes before any TIF capture, including $233,776 for School District 106 and $261,279 for High School District 113 (both included in the total).

Source: P p. 51
Documented Taxes & TIF

Hotels carry ~44% of projected Village taxes — with a feasibility caveat

The developer’s fiscal consultant notes current market conditions do not support feasible hotel construction, yet hotels account for roughly 44% of modeled direct Village tax receipts.

Source: P pp. 48, 50–52
Developer proposal Village-owned land

$1,000 for a 0.23-acre Village parcel

Requested one-time sale of parcel 16-19-100-003 (0 Duffy Lane) plus a redevelopment agreement. Its legal description is the north 15 feet of the east half of Government Lot 1, NW quarter of Section 19, a narrow strip. Approval pending.

Source: P p. 61
Developer proposal Village-owned land

99-year lease of 11.08 acres at $999 a year

Requested lease of parcel 16-19-105-004 (0 Duffy Lane) plus a redevelopment agreement. A flat $999 over 99 years totals $98,901 in nominal rent; that arithmetic says nothing about land value or the full terms. Approval pending.

Source: P p. 61
Documented Village-owned land

The Village is not a co-applicant

The application states the Village is not a co-applicant and that disposition of Village parcels requires negotiation.

Source: A PDF pp. 2, 23
Open question Village-owned land

Valuation and obligations unknown

No appraisal, alternative-use analysis, public-benefit terms, maintenance/liability obligations or separate approval process has been described.

Source: P p. 61
Documented Zoning & governance

From College zoning to a new multi-use district

The core campus is zoned C — College. The filing requests a text amendment creating a new multi-use district, a map amendment for two southern parcels, and conceptual PUD approval as a special use.

Source: S pp. 2, 4
Documented Zoning & governance

What concept approval can lock in

Conceptual PUD approval can establish permitted use categories, intensity, circulation, buffers, phasing and other broad parameters. It does not replace later detailed and final plans.

Source: S pp. 4–5
Documented Zoning & governance

Hearing opened Oct 5, continued to Nov 2

The staff report directed the commission to continue the hearing to November 2 without substantive action on the October 5 requests.

Source: S pp. 1–2
Developer proposal Zoning & governance

A broad list of permitted use categories

The proposed use matrix includes potential residential accommodation/townhomes, movie theaters, office/coworking and certain light-industrial/warehouse-type uses. Being on the list is not a commitment to build them.

Source: A PDF p. 14 & App. J; P p. 30
Open question Zoning & governance

Which uses would need no further review?

The Village has not yet specified which use categories would be permitted by right versus conditional.

Source: A PDF App. J
Open question Zoning & governance

Two phasing calendars

The application describes sports uses in 2026–2028 and commercial/hotel phases into 2030; the revised presentation shows sports Q3 2026–Q3 2027 and commercial/community Q4 2027–Q3 2028.

Source: A PDF p. 26; P p. 59
Documented Zoning & governance

Recusals are recorded in the minutes

PCZBA minutes record Anthony Donato as recused from the Feb 2, 2026 temporary-use recommendation (4–0) and the May 4, 2026 housing vote.

Source: M 2026-02-02; M 2026-05-04
Documented Zoning & governance

No longer on the commission roster

The Village’s current PCZBA roster, checked Oct 14, 2026, does not list Anthony Donato.

Source: V commission roster
Developer proposal Environment & neighborhood

A permanent 79-foot-tall dome

Requested relief would allow a permanent, 79-foot-tall air-supported dome.

Source: S p. 11
Developer proposal Environment & neighborhood

Field-light poles up to 80 feet

Outdoor field-light poles up to 80 feet with cutoff fixtures.

Source: S p. 10
Developer proposal Environment & neighborhood

Other buildings up to 45 feet

Up to 45 feet or three stories, whichever is greater.

Source: S p. 11
Developer proposal Environment & neighborhood

Signs up to 25 feet tall

Pylon/ground signs up to 25 feet tall and 15 feet wide, with more flexible color and dome-sign standards.

Source: S p. 11
Documented Environment & neighborhood

The Chicago Stars comparison

Staff cites the nearby Chicago Stars facility, approved separately for a seasonal dome up to 69 feet (in place Nov 1 – Mar 31 only), 70-foot light poles, lighting hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and a residential illumination standard. It is a different, seasonal facility, not an equivalent; those conditions have not automatically been applied to The QUAD.

Source: S p. 11
Documented Environment & neighborhood

Dome moved toward I-94 after resident feedback

The latest concept places the dome toward Lakeside Drive / I-94 rather than the eastern residential edge. Final visibility, equipment noise, light spill and hours still need enforceable standards.

Source: S p. 9; P p. 35
Documented Environment & neighborhood

Temporary-use terms are not permanent entitlements

April Village Board minutes describe a 60-decibel amplified-sound limit and Meyer Sports Complex use until midnight under revised temporary-use terms.

Source: M 2026-04-13
Reported account Environment & neighborhood

The TBK Sports Complex comparison

A neighbor says Anthony Donato cited Bettendorf, Iowa’s TBK Bank Sports Complex as inspiration in a March 17, 2026 conversation; it is not named in the October application. TBK’s reported 1.5 million area visits in 2025 are not a forecast for The QUAD.

Source: Resident account; Iowa League of Cities
Reported account Historical timeline

Earlier interest: Hillwood (2025)

In 2025, The Real Deal reported that an affiliate of Hillwood, the Dallas firm of Ross Perot Jr., was negotiating to buy about 80 acres of the campus for about $35 million for commercial redevelopment. Village Board minutes record the deal as terminated in fall 2025. The Donato purchase covered the whole campus; a proposed price for part of the site is not an appraisal.

Source: The Real Deal, Apr 14, 2025; M 2025-09-08
Documented Historical timeline

Campus sold for $20 million

Lake County conveyance records show a $20 million transaction dated Jan 8, 2026 (recorded Jan 29) from Trinity College to the Donato Foundation.

Source: Lake County conveyance record
Documented Historical timeline

Sports and family entertainment ideas presented

On Jan 12, 2026, Anthony Donato presented sports and family entertainment ideas to Village trustees; the minutes describe their response as enthusiastic.

Source: M 2026-01-12
Documented Historical timeline

2023 Comprehensive Plan discussion

On Oct 30, 2023, Donato took part as a commissioner in a Comprehensive Plan discussion of future Trinity uses. This predates the foundation’s purchase.

Source: M 2023-10-30