Your voice matters in decisions about Bannockburn’s future.
1 · Public hearingAttend the public hearingDeerfield High School, North Cafe (Cafeteria). Come in person to hear the proposal and be heard.Meeting details & directions →
2Tell your friends & neighborsHelp other Bannockburn residents understand what’s being proposed.
3Send a message to the Village
Share your questions or perspective with Village officials. In the form, choose “Other” and mention The QUAD /
PZ26-0008. This general contact form is not confirmed as formal hearing testimony.
Contact the Village ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Each finding is labeled by what kind of evidence supports it and cites the document and page. Use the link on any
finding to share it directly.
Which version of the plan is being reviewed?
The developer’s application and presentation contain different figures for several important parts of The QUAD.
Some may reflect evolving plans or different assumptions, but clarification would help residents understand exactly
what is being considered.
Dome sizeConflicting figures+−310,000 sq. ft. on the site plans; 217,500 sq. ft. in the fiscal assumptions.
Application · Sept 29“Dome Turf Facility,” 310,000 sq. ft. (A p. 79).
Presentation · Oct 5Master plans and site data show 310,000 sq. ft. (P pp. 26–28, 32); the fiscal program table lists 217,500 sq. ft. (P p. 47).
Traffic assumptionsDiffering assumption+−The traffic memo models one 120-room hotel and a 10,000 sq. ft. daycare; the program shows 226 rooms and 30,000 sq. ft.
Application · Sept 29KLOA memo models “Hotel (120 Rooms)” and “Day Care Center (10,000 s.f.)” (A p. 87). The program lists two hotels, 106 + 120 rooms, and a 30,000 sq. ft. daycare (A pp. 79–80).
Presentation · Oct 5Two hotels, 226 rooms (P p. 48); daycare 30,000 sq. ft. (P p. 47). The traffic slide gives no trip counts (P p. 45).
Athletic facilitiesConflicting figures+−Court and field counts differ: 3 courts and 5 fields in the application; 10 courts, 2 rinks and 9 fields in the presentation’s program.
Application · Sept 29Indoor facilities 80,000 sq. ft. with 3 basketball courts; outdoor athletics 8.5 acres with 5 fields or diamonds (A p. 79).
Presentation · Oct 5Main indoor facilities 230,500 sq. ft. with 10 courts and 2 ice rinks; 12.2 acres with 9 fields or diamonds (P p. 47). Master plans show 5 fields (P pp. 26, 28).
Commercial usesDetail in one document+−Outlot counts and uses vary, and some uses appear in only one document.
Application · Sept 29Six retail/restaurant outlots on Half Day Road, 25,000 sq. ft. (A p. 79). A gas station appears as a supporting use; a car wash is not mentioned (A p. 30).
Presentation · Oct 5Six outlots in the program (P p. 47), but the mixed-use plan shows four outlot uses, including a gas station, retail and tunnel car wash (P p. 27). The 50,000 sq. ft. family entertainment center appears only in the fiscal table (P p. 47).
Development phasingConflicting figures+−Construction schedules and phase assignments differ between the two documents.
Application · Sept 29Sports complex Q1 2027–Q2 2028; commercial/retail hub Q4 2028–Q3 2030; community/culture Q1–Q3 2029 (A p. 26).
The Donato Foundation applied for a conceptual planned unit development at the former Trinity International University campus. The requested mixed-use zoning covers sports, recreation, retail, commercial, community and cultural uses.
Source: S pp. 1–5; A PDF pp. 1–4
Developer proposal
Development scope
About 116 acres, including two Village-owned parcels
The PUD boundary covers roughly 116 acres. It includes parcels owned by the foundation and two parcels owned by the Village that the applicant wants to incorporate.
Source: S p. 6; A PDF p. 2
Estimate
Development scope
About 800,000 sq. ft. of buildings at full buildout
The developer’s preliminary development program totals approximately 800,000 square feet. Figures in different parts of the presentation are not perfectly consistent.
Source: P p. 47
Developer proposal
Development scope
230,500 sq. ft. of main indoor sports space
Described as 10 basketball courts, 2 ice rinks and support space.
Source: P p. 47
Open question
Development scope
The dome’s size differs between tables
The fiscal program lists the air-supported dome turf facility at 217,500 sq. ft.; the parking/site-data table lists “Dome” at 310,000 sq. ft. The applicant has not reconciled the two.
Source: P pp. 32, 47
Developer proposal
Development scope
12.2 acres of outdoor athletics
The fiscal program lists 12.2 acres and nine multipurpose fields/diamonds.
Source: P p. 47
Developer proposal
Development scope
Two hotels with 226 rooms
A 106-room hotel at Trinity Hall (the parking table says “106 beds”) and a 120-room upper-midscale hotel, which the site plan refers to as a Marriott-branded concept.
Source: P pp. 32, 47–48
Developer proposal
Development scope
Entertainment, restaurants and roadside retail
A 50,000 sq. ft. family entertainment center (bowling, arcade, food and beverage among potential uses), 35,000 sq. ft. of hotel/banquet restaurants, six conceptual outlots totaling 25,000 sq. ft. along Half Day Road, two drive-through restaurants (4,500 and 2,500 sq. ft.) and a 3,500 sq. ft. gas station/retail/tunnel car wash.
Source: P pp. 30, 32, 47
Developer proposal
Development scope
Community, medical and event space
Daycare (30,000 sq. ft.), library (32,000 sq. ft.; potential public-library dedication is marked as a question in the developer’s assumptions), rehabilitation facility (20,000), ministry building expansion (22,500), banquet hall (18,000) and mansion/event space (5,000).
Source: P p. 47
Estimate
Development scope
“Open space” includes fields and stormwater areas
The application estimates 33 acres (28.4%) of public or common open space at full buildout, counting fields, trails, wetlands and stormwater detention. It does not establish how much would be freely accessible public parkland.
Source: A PDF pp. 23–26; S p. 6
Developer proposal
Traffic & parking
2,518 parking spaces
The parking model shows 2,798 spaces before a 280-space accessibility/landscape-island adjustment, for 2,518 provided.
Source: P p. 32
Developer proposal
Traffic & parking
Off-site parking for large events
The applicant requests flexibility to use off-site parking for occasional tournament demand.
Source: S p. 10
Developer proposal
Traffic & parking
Vehicle access from Half Day Road
Access is primarily via Half Day Road / IL 22 at Lakeside Drive and Trinity University Drive.
Source: A PDF p. 86; S p. 10
Documented
Traffic & parking
No road connection to Duffy Lane is proposed
The Village staff report says no new vehicle road connection to Duffy Lane is proposed, though walking paths may connect toward Duffy.
Source: S p. 10
Estimate
Traffic & parking
7,586 net daily vehicle trips — not 7,586 visitors
The KLOA preliminary memo (Aug 12) estimates 11,632 gross and 7,586 net new daily one-way vehicle trips, counting each entry and each exit. It uses ITE trip-generation factors with a 10% internal-capture reduction and pass-by reductions.
Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Estimate
Traffic & parking
Peak-hour estimates
Net trips, both directions: 532 in the weekday AM peak hour, 967 in the weekday PM peak hour, and 875 reported for the Saturday midday peak.
Source: A PDF p. 87
Open question
Traffic & parking
The Saturday table doesn’t add up
Saturday “In” (513) plus “Out” (392) equals 905, not the 875 reported. In the basketball row, 36 + 43 = 79, but the total cell reads 49. A corrected table should come from KLOA.
Source: A PDF p. 87
Open question
Traffic & parking
Traffic inputs differ from the current program
KLOA models 120 hotel rooms (vs. 226), 10,000 sq. ft. of daycare (vs. 30,000) and eight soccer fields (vs. nine fields/diamonds). Some categories differ in kind, so this does not by itself prove an underestimate, but reconciliation is needed.
Source: A PDF p. 87; P p. 47
Documented
Traffic & parking
A preliminary memo, not a full operations study
The memo states IL 22 carries about 20,900 vehicles a day against an estimated 30,000 capacity. It does not settle intersection operations, queues or tournament-day conditions.
Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Open question
Traffic & parking
No visitor forecast has been submitted
The submitted materials do not include a clearly comparable annual or peak-weekend visitor forecast. Vehicle trips cannot be converted directly into attendance.
Source: A PDF pp. 86–88
Developer proposal
Taxes & TIF
Sports exempt, commercial taxable
The applicant says Phase 1 sports facilities would be foundation-owned and intended to stay tax-exempt; Phase 2 commercial lots would be platted for sale or lease and reassessed as taxable; Phase 3 community amenities are intended to remain exempt.
Source: A PDF p. 25
Open question
Taxes & TIF
Status of a nonprofit exemption request
Earlier county research identified a pending 2026 nonprofit full-exemption request for parcel 16-19-105-007, reportedly received Sept 17, 2026. Current status should be checked in the county system. Illinois exemptions depend on qualifying ownership and use.
Source: Lake County exemption record
Developer proposal
Taxes & TIF
The developer proposes a TIF district
The presentation includes a “TIF District / Development Agreement” step, estimates 120–180 days for it, and says demolition of deteriorated buildings would be deferred until the TIF is established.
Source: P p. 60
Developer proposal
Taxes & TIF
Near-zero base value; demolition potentially reimbursable
The developer models an approximately zero base equalized assessed valuation under nonprofit exemption, with increment from taxable development on the north half. Demolition after district establishment is identified as potentially reimbursable.
Source: P p. 62
Open question
Taxes & TIF
No TIF terms exist yet
The filings establish no approved TIF boundaries, redevelopment plan, independent eligibility study, reimbursement ceiling, borrowing schedule or executed agreement.
Source: P pp. 60–62
Developer proposal
Taxes & TIF
Several possible funding sources; no investors named
The application lists foundation equity, philanthropy, grants, institutional lenders, development partnerships and tenant/operator investment as possible sources. It does not name all eventual financing partners, commercial owners or operators.
Source: A PDF pp. 20, 25
Estimate
Taxes & TIF
Developer projects ~$1.18M a year for the Village
At full buildout: $604,375 in sales/food-and-beverage taxes, $517,114 in hotel tax and $59,824 in Village property taxes. These are projections, not guarantees.
Source: P pp. 48–52
Estimate
Taxes & TIF
$739,136 a year for other taxing bodies
Projected gross property taxes before any TIF capture, including $233,776 for School District 106 and $261,279 for High School District 113 (both included in the total).
Source: P p. 51
Documented
Taxes & TIF
Hotels carry ~44% of projected Village taxes — with a feasibility caveat
The developer’s fiscal consultant notes current market conditions do not support feasible hotel construction, yet hotels account for roughly 44% of modeled direct Village tax receipts.
Source: P pp. 48, 50–52
Developer proposal
Village-owned land
$1,000 for a 0.23-acre Village parcel
Requested one-time sale of parcel 16-19-100-003 (0 Duffy Lane) plus a redevelopment agreement. Its legal description is the north 15 feet of the east half of Government Lot 1, NW quarter of Section 19, a narrow strip. Approval pending.
Source: P p. 61
Developer proposal
Village-owned land
99-year lease of 11.08 acres at $999 a year
Requested lease of parcel 16-19-105-004 (0 Duffy Lane) plus a redevelopment agreement. A flat $999 over 99 years totals $98,901 in nominal rent; that arithmetic says nothing about land value or the full terms. Approval pending.
Source: P p. 61
Documented
Village-owned land
The Village is not a co-applicant
The application states the Village is not a co-applicant and that disposition of Village parcels requires negotiation.
Source: A PDF pp. 2, 23
Open question
Village-owned land
Valuation and obligations unknown
No appraisal, alternative-use analysis, public-benefit terms, maintenance/liability obligations or separate approval process has been described.
Source: P p. 61
Documented
Zoning & governance
From College zoning to a new multi-use district
The core campus is zoned C — College. The filing requests a text amendment creating a new multi-use district, a map amendment for two southern parcels, and conceptual PUD approval as a special use.
Source: S pp. 2, 4
Documented
Zoning & governance
What concept approval can lock in
Conceptual PUD approval can establish permitted use categories, intensity, circulation, buffers, phasing and other broad parameters. It does not replace later detailed and final plans.
Source: S pp. 4–5
Documented
Zoning & governance
Hearing opened Oct 5, continued to Nov 2
The staff report directed the commission to continue the hearing to November 2 without substantive action on the October 5 requests.
Source: S pp. 1–2
Developer proposal
Zoning & governance
A broad list of permitted use categories
The proposed use matrix includes potential residential accommodation/townhomes, movie theaters, office/coworking and certain light-industrial/warehouse-type uses. Being on the list is not a commitment to build them.
Source: A PDF p. 14 & App. J; P p. 30
Open question
Zoning & governance
Which uses would need no further review?
The Village has not yet specified which use categories would be permitted by right versus conditional.
Source: A PDF App. J
Open question
Zoning & governance
Two phasing calendars
The application describes sports uses in 2026–2028 and commercial/hotel phases into 2030; the revised presentation shows sports Q3 2026–Q3 2027 and commercial/community Q4 2027–Q3 2028.
Source: A PDF p. 26; P p. 59
Documented
Zoning & governance
Recusals are recorded in the minutes
PCZBA minutes record Anthony Donato as recused from the Feb 2, 2026 temporary-use recommendation (4–0) and the May 4, 2026 housing vote.
Source: M 2026-02-02; M 2026-05-04
Documented
Zoning & governance
No longer on the commission roster
The Village’s current PCZBA roster, checked Oct 14, 2026, does not list Anthony Donato.
Source: V commission roster
Developer proposal
Environment & neighborhood
A permanent 79-foot-tall dome
Requested relief would allow a permanent, 79-foot-tall air-supported dome.
Source: S p. 11
Developer proposal
Environment & neighborhood
Field-light poles up to 80 feet
Outdoor field-light poles up to 80 feet with cutoff fixtures.
Source: S p. 10
Developer proposal
Environment & neighborhood
Other buildings up to 45 feet
Up to 45 feet or three stories, whichever is greater.
Source: S p. 11
Developer proposal
Environment & neighborhood
Signs up to 25 feet tall
Pylon/ground signs up to 25 feet tall and 15 feet wide, with more flexible color and dome-sign standards.
Source: S p. 11
Documented
Environment & neighborhood
The Chicago Stars comparison
Staff cites the nearby Chicago Stars facility, approved separately for a seasonal dome up to 69 feet (in place Nov 1 – Mar 31 only), 70-foot light poles, lighting hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and a residential illumination standard. It is a different, seasonal facility, not an equivalent; those conditions have not automatically been applied to The QUAD.
Source: S p. 11
Documented
Environment & neighborhood
Dome moved toward I-94 after resident feedback
The latest concept places the dome toward Lakeside Drive / I-94 rather than the eastern residential edge. Final visibility, equipment noise, light spill and hours still need enforceable standards.
Source: S p. 9; P p. 35
Documented
Environment & neighborhood
Temporary-use terms are not permanent entitlements
April Village Board minutes describe a 60-decibel amplified-sound limit and Meyer Sports Complex use until midnight under revised temporary-use terms.
Source: M 2026-04-13
Reported account
Environment & neighborhood
The TBK Sports Complex comparison
A neighbor says Anthony Donato cited Bettendorf, Iowa’s TBK Bank Sports Complex as inspiration in a March 17, 2026 conversation; it is not named in the October application. TBK’s reported 1.5 million area visits in 2025 are not a forecast for The QUAD.
Source: Resident account; Iowa League of Cities
Reported account
Historical timeline
Earlier interest: Hillwood (2025)
In 2025, The Real Deal reported that an affiliate of Hillwood, the Dallas firm of Ross Perot Jr., was negotiating to buy about 80 acres of the campus for about $35 million for commercial redevelopment. Village Board minutes record the deal as terminated in fall 2025. The Donato purchase covered the whole campus; a proposed price for part of the site is not an appraisal.
Source: The Real Deal, Apr 14, 2025; M 2025-09-08
Documented
Historical timeline
Campus sold for $20 million
Lake County conveyance records show a $20 million transaction dated Jan 8, 2026 (recorded Jan 29) from Trinity College to the Donato Foundation.
Source: Lake County conveyance record
Documented
Historical timeline
Sports and family entertainment ideas presented
On Jan 12, 2026, Anthony Donato presented sports and family entertainment ideas to Village trustees; the minutes describe their response as enthusiastic.
Source: M 2026-01-12
Documented
Historical timeline
2023 Comprehensive Plan discussion
On Oct 30, 2023, Donato took part as a commissioner in a Comprehensive Plan discussion of future Trinity uses. This predates the foundation’s purchase.